President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan would no
doubt go down in the modern history of Nigeria as the most unjustly treated
Nigerian President whose real contribution in the political and administrative development
of our nation would never be justly measurable.
Let me state categorical clear that I am not a
pro Jonathan and I still continue to believe till date that Nigeria since
independence has not yet produced any real leader whose achievement could be
rated above average or even close to the average line, considering the human
and the natural potentials of our great country, Nigeria. Let me also state that I personally do not
believe in the sham constantly sold to us as democracy in Nigeria and do not
believe in any of the constituted political parties today or before now, to me
they are all the same group of self centered elites in power or desperately
seeking power in order to enrich themselves at the expense of our dear nation
and its teeming population.
Haven said that, I must confess that one thing
accidentally appears to be speaking in favor of President Goodluck Ebele
Jonathan and that thing is no other than the fact that never in the history of
Nigeria have we had the kind of security challenge that we have today, not even
during the cruel civil war era of 1967 and 1970 because then it was a region
fighting against Nigeria and the idea was clear on both sides and the level of
violence employed was immeasurable, every Ibo man and woman and even children,
were considered as potential enemies and their extermination was not seen as unfair
or disproportionate by the Nigerian authorities, that was the same feeling too
that the Igbos at the time nurtured about Nigeria and Nigerians. This is not
intended to justify the barbarities committed on both sides of the divide during
that condemnable war but to prove that today´s war on our nation lack a
conventional battle field and a recognized enemy or enemies since it is
accepted that unlike when the whole Igbo people were considered as enemies,
today it cannot be said that every Northerner is an enemy neither can it be
said that every Muslim is an enemy which makes it much more difficult to fight
the menace of the Boko Haram except we want to identify the whole northern
region as our enemy which will be very unjust and out rightly irrational even
though we know that a lot of northerners are sympathizers of this sanguinary group
and that some of them even within the government and the corridors of power are
helping to complicate the management of the crisis.
Even
during the the Niger-Delta upheaval under rtd Gen Olusegun Obasanjo led civilian regime or the late Gen Sani
Abacha led military government we cannot match the situation with what is prevalent under the government of President Goodluck
Ebele Jonathan. Let us not forget that both, General Obasanjo and General
Abacha were trained military officers who still had their loyalists in the army
as at the time of the crisis and as a result could easily manage the crisis
effectively through the efficient collaboration of their loyalists in the armed
forces, which is not the same case with President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan who
is the first civilian President in Nigeria to actually face the problem of full blown terrorism since the problem was only at a teething stage during the late
President Yar A´dua government.
Unlike
the Boko Haram, the Niger-delta struggle had a clear cut and negotiable face to
it, it also had a humanitarian undertone to its struggles, many oil
infrastructures were bombed and sabotaged but there was really no massive and indiscriminate
killings of Nigerians at least of the magnitude that we are seeing today with the Boko Haram, if we must be
honest to ourselves, the Niger-Delta geo political zone was before the arms
struggle the most unfairly treated region in the Nigerian federation, a nation cannot
be getting close to 70% of its wealth from a region and allow the region to
suffer such a blatant developmental imbalance as was done for decades with the Niger-Delta region. But in all the years that the
Boko Haram have taken up arms against the federation, their activities have been
void of any sanity and if the frequent declarations of their spokesperson, Abubakar Shekau is anything to go by, then it does not fit in nor create any atmosphere for any form of dialogue much less, amnesty.
The
pathetic thing is that those who are masked behind the Boko Haram, first
ensured that they had initially destroyed the Nigerian armed forces and are
still constantly weakening its strength through a politicization of the
military and the strategic positioning of saboteurs within the rank and file of
the Nigerian armed forces and within the intelligence services. The efficiency of
a smaller Cameroonian force at their border in frequent armed face off with the
Boko Haram is evidence to how so inefficient we have rendered our own world highly
rated armed forces.
President Gooluck Ebele Jonathan unfortunately
is not a military man in a nation that was intermittently prepared during over
four decades to be governed by the military, a nation that still has Buhari,
Obasanjo, Babangida and Abacha´s loyalists in its army much more than it has President
Jonathan´s loyalists and much more than it has patriots and nationalists. Take
for instance when Gen Obasanjo was president, he could call on a handful of batallion commandants who are his boys and trust them to carry out a top secret operation
on the enemy without a prior leakage of the plan, today under President Goodluck Jonathan we are seeing that it is
practically impossible, the enemy is always a step ahead in intelligence
collation and a much more devastating military reaction than our armed forces.
The only way that the incumbent president can
tackle this menace efficiently is to pay more attention to the political wing
of the Boko Haram than its military wing; the government should arrests
sponsors, armed suppliers and ideologists of the group and begin to deal with
them. The presidency should for once be honest with Nigerians and stop treating
this very complicated and dangerous issue with vague attitude.
No comments:
Post a Comment